Efectividad del entrenamiento muscular pélvico temprano en la fuerza de suelo pélvico, síntomas de incontinencia urinaria, función sexual y calidad de vida en pacientes posprostatectomía radical: revisión sistemática de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados / Effectiveness of early pelvic muscle training on pelvic floor strength, urinary incontinence symptoms, sexual function, and quality of life in post-radical prostatectomy patients: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la efectividad del entrenamiento muscular pélvico temprano para reducir los síntomas de incontinencia urinaria, mejorar la calidad de vida, función sexual y aumentar la fuerza de suelo pélvico en pacientes posprostatectomía radical. Se realizó una búsqueda en 8 bases de datos hasta el 26 de octubre de 2022, se evaluó la calidad metodológica y el riesgo de sesgo de 14 estudios incluidos (n=1236), se calculó la evidencia y el metaanálisis. El entrenamiento redujo significativamente los síntomas de incontinencia urinaria en comparación con un grupo control (DME=−2,80; IC 95%=−5,21 a −0,39; p=0,02), con heterogeneidad significativa (I2=83%; p=<0,0001) y evidencia moderada. Además, presentó evidencia moderada para mejorar la calidad de vida, y muy baja para mejorar la función sexual y fuerza de suelo pélvico. Estos resultados deben ser observados con precaución debido a la heterogeneidad significativa de los estudios analizados. (AU)

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early pelvic muscle training in reducing urinary incontinence symptoms, improving quality of life, sexual function, and increasing pelvic floor strength in post-radical prostatectomy patients. A search was carried out in 8 databases until October 26, 2022, the methodological quality and the risk of bias of 14 included studies (n=1236) were evaluated, moreover, the evidence and the meta-analysis were calculated. The intervention significantly reduced urinary incontinence symptoms compared to a control group (SMD=−2.80, 95% CI=−5.21 to −0.39, P=.02), with significant heterogeneity (I2=83%; P=<.0001) and moderate evidence. In addition, it presented moderate evidence to improve quality of life, and very low evidence to improve sexual function and pelvic floor strength. These results should be viewed with caution due to the significant heterogeneity of the studies analysed. (AU)

[Effectiveness of early pelvic muscle training on pelvic floor strength, urinary incontinence symptoms, sexual function, and quality of life in post-radical prostatectomy patients: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials]. / Efectividad del entrenamiento muscular pélvico temprano en la fuerza de suelo pélvico, síntomas de incontinencia urinaria, función sexual y calidad de vida en pacientes posprostatectomía radical: revisión sistemática de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early pelvic muscle training in reducing urinary incontinence symptoms, improving quality of life, sexual function, and increasing pelvic floor strength in post-radical prostatectomy patients. A search was carried out in 8 databases until October 26, 2022, the methodological quality and the risk of bias of 14 included studies (n=1236) were evaluated, moreover, the evidence and the meta-analysis were calculated. The intervention significantly reduced urinary incontinence symptoms compared to a control group (SMD=-2.80, 95% CI=-5.21 to -0.39, P=.02), with significant heterogeneity (I2=83%; P=<.0001) and moderate evidence. In addition, it presented moderate evidence to improve quality of life, and very low evidence to improve sexual function and pelvic floor strength. These results should be viewed with caution due to the significant heterogeneity of the studies analysed.

Propiedades psicométricas de la escala Post-COVID-19 Functional Status para adultos sobrevivientes de COVID-19 / Psychometric properties of the Post-COVID 19 Functional Status scale for adult COVID 19 survivors

Introducción: Para evaluar el estado funcional es fundamental contar con instrumentos simples que permitan hacer un seguimiento del curso de los síntomas y del compromiso que pueden presentar las personas adultas sobrevivientes de COVID-19. Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la escala de estado funcional post-COVID-19 (Post COVID-19 Functional Status [PCFS]). Material y método: Corresponde a un estudio transversal de validación de escala. En la validación de contenido participaron 22 profesionales sanitarios, quienes mediante juicio de expertos evaluaron la escala en las categorías de suficiencia, claridad, coherencia y relevancia. Así también, dos profesionales realizaron la prueba de test-retest con 20 personas que habían cursado con infección por COVID-19. Adicionalmente, expusieron sus observaciones y comentarios. El grado de acuerdo entre los expertos fue determinado con el coeficiente de Kendall. Para el test-retest se utilizó el coeficiente de Spearman. En todos los análisis fue considerado significativo un valor de p<0,05. Resultados: En relación con la validez de contenido, hubo acuerdo entre evaluadores solo para la categoría relevancia (p=0,032). Se obtuvo buena fuerza de concordancia entre dos evaluadores (Rho de Spearman=0,929 para la puntuación). Se ajustaron algunos términos del contenido sin afectar la estructura general de la escala. De los 16 ítems originales que componen la escala PCFS, no se eliminó ninguno.ConclusionesLa versión en español para Chile de la PCFS, adaptada al contexto cultural del país, muestra buenas características psicométricas en términos de confiabilidad.(AU)

Introduction: To evaluate functional state, it is fundamental to have simple instruments that allow for monitoring the course of symptoms and the commitment of the functional status that adult COVID-19 survivors may present. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Post COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale. Material and methods: A cross-sectional scale validation study was performed. In the content validation 22-health professionals, whom through expert judgment evaluated the scale in the sufficiency, clarity, coherence and relevance categories. In addition, two professionals performed the retest with 20 people who had been infected with COVID-19. In addition, their observations and comments are revealed. The degree of agreement amongst the experts was determined with the Kendall coefficient. For the retest test, the Spearman coefficient was utilized. In all the analyzes, a P value of <.05 was considered. Results: In regards to the content validity, there was agreement between raters only for the relevance category (P=.032). A strong agreement was obtained between two evaluators (Spearman's Rho=.929 for the score). Some of the content terms were adjusted without affecting the general structure of the scale. Of the original 16 items that make up the PCFS scale, none was eliminated. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the PCFS (Chile) was adapted to the cultural context of the country, shows good psychometric characteristics in terms of reliability.(AU)

[Psychometric properties of the Post-COVID 19 Functional Status scale for adult COVID 19 survivors]. / Propiedades psicométricas de la escala Post-COVID-19 Functional Status para adultos sobrevivientes de COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate functional state, it is fundamental to have simple instruments that allow for monitoring the course of symptoms and the commitment of the functional status that adult COVID-19 survivors may present. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Post COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional scale validation study was performed. In the content validation 22-health professionals, whom through expert judgment evaluated the scale in the sufficiency, clarity, coherence and relevance categories. In addition, two professionals performed the retest with 20 people who had been infected with COVID-19. In addition, their observations and comments are revealed. The degree of agreement amongst the experts was determined with the Kendall coefficient. For the retest test, the Spearman coefficient was utilized. In all the analyzes, a P value of <.05 was considered. RESULTS: In regards to the content validity, there was agreement between raters only for the relevance category (P=.032). A strong agreement was obtained between two evaluators (Spearman's Rho=.929 for the score). Some of the content terms were adjusted without affecting the general structure of the scale. Of the original 16 items that make up the PCFS scale, none was eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the PCFS (Chile) was adapted to the cultural context of the country, shows good psychometric characteristics in terms of reliability.

[Identification of ICF categories representative of functioning problems in adult cancer patients at hospital discharge: National expert consensus]. / Identificación de un conjunto de categorías CIF representativas del funcionamiento al egreso hospitalario de personas adultas tratadas por cáncer: consenso nacional de expertos.

INTRODUCTION: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a standardised language and conceptual framework for health and health-related conditions, aiming to unify communication between different disciplines. OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of selecting (through national expert consensus) ICF categories representative of functioning problems in cancer patients at hospital discharge. METHOD: We conducted a descriptive qualitative and quantitative study that used the expert consensus method to design a clinical instrument. The study included 21 experts, consisting of 2 patients and 19 health professionals from different disciplines. A total of 208 ICF categories obtained in a previous stage through a systematic review and linking process were evaluated in 3 rounds. Participants evaluated each code and classified it as: highly relevant, relevant, slightly relevant, and not relevant at all. Only those codes assessed as «highly relevant¼ by more than 50% of the experts were included (cut off). In addition, another 143 ICF categories were evaluated in the second round. RESULTS: In all, 24 ICF categories were obtained: 10 corresponded to the body function component, 11 to activities and participation, and 3 to environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus using the common language of the ICF resulted in the selection of 24 representative categories of the main health problems related to functioning at hospital discharge in adults treated for cancer.